Skip to content

Prince Estate Aims to Show Tidal "Fabricated" Equity Deal


An ongoing copyright lawsuit explores what evidence needs to be handed over.

streaming outlet to distribute many of the iconic musician's albums. NPG Records and NPG Music Publishing, two entities now controlled by Prince's Estate, continue to insist otherwise in an ongoing copyright lawsuit.

On Friday, in a push for more documents, NPG told the judge of having "uncovered evidence that the alleged contract the Defendants are relying on in this action — the Equity Term Sheet — was fabricated and back-dated to appear authentic."

Tidal famously has given an ownership percentage to some of the big-name artists who agreed to let their works be exploited. Before he passed away in April 2016, Prince certainly made a deal with Tidal for a recorded studio album titled Hit n Run, but NPG says there's no evidence that the agreement contemplated other works or that Prince was ever issued Tidal equity before the dispute arose.

NPG is now after documents pertaining to the circumstances of the execution of the alleged equity deal, but argues being "stymied by improper privilege claims."

Specifically, NPG has eyes on communications from Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins, who may have been the closest thing to Prince's manager.

"Contemporaneous communications between the parties are inconsistent with Tidal’s contention that Ellis-Lamkins signed the Equity Term Sheet on Prince’s behalf on July 19, 2015," states a heavily redacted motion in Minnesota federal court.

Among the messages being withheld are emails with subject lines like "P would like to speak with J" and "Can u tell P to call right back for 1 second J has 1 question they just got off."

If Prince and Jay-Z spoke on the phone, though, and came to some sort of deal, perhaps bolstered by the later delivery of materials, NPG sees enough in the timing of messages as well as what's previously been produced in litigation to be suspicious.

Roc Nation and the other defendants are holding these Ellis-Lamkins messages back over an alleged "common interest" with her. They say she shares serious concerns about how the former administrator of Prince's Estate dealt with rights and conducted transactions. Asserting attorney-client privilege, they'd prefer she be deposed as a witness.

NPG rejects any "common interest," asserting that Ellis-Lamkins was really concerned about how she was removed from the manager of Prince's companies, and that this "personal" and non-legal interest doesn't merit the shielding of documents.



No Trackbacks


Display comments as Linear | Threaded

No comments

Add Comment

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.

Form options